Articles

Back to Articles

August 16, 2010

Disclaimer Wills- 2011

Disclaimer Wills

 

Although we are now in 2010, and the Estate tax has been eliminated on the Federal level for this year only, it is expected to come back with a vengeance next year.  Furthermore, New York State still has an Estate tax which may affect the Estate.  Therefore, in this article I am setting forth some concepts of Estate planning which worked in 2009 and should continue to be effective throughout 2011.  It is likely that the Estate tax-Gift tax foundation will remain the same as was in 2009, with only changes to threshold levels at which tax will be imposed in 2011.

 

If you are married and have a potentially taxable Estate, i.e. gross assets, including life insurance not held in a trust, which exceed in value $1,000,000.00 (N.Y.) or $3,500,000 (Federal), then you should have a “Disclaimer” Will to save on estate taxes.  The disclaimer will enables each spouse to fully utilize the unified credit available to the estate of each spouse to shelter up to $7,000.000.00 in assets from death tax.  To explain, see the following example.

 

Let’s say your estate is $7,000,000.00 and you own everything jointly with your spouse.  Let’s further assume that your spouse has provided the consideration to acquire one-half of the assets and will acquire the other one-half of the assets upon your death under a survivorship interest.   If you died in New York in 2009, your estate would have no death tax payable on either the New York or Federal level.  This is because your Estate could claim an unlimited marital deduction to offset any property passing to the surviving spouse.  The same marital deduction would apply to all assets in your own name left to your spouse in a simple “I love you” will. 

 

But now look at the surviving spouse’s estate tax situation.  If she were to also have died later in 2009, then she would have had a $7,000,000 estate passing to children or more remote descendants and no marital deduction to offset any tax.  Her estate would have had the benefit of a tax credit allowed by law (called the “unified credit”) which shelters assets totaling $1,000,000.00 in New York and $3,500,000.00 on the Federal return.  Nevertheless, the remaining taxable assets incurred a marginal rate of approximately 12.8% at the state level and 45% at the federal level.  The actual tax due to the New York and Federal governments, excluding any deduction for funeral expenses, was be $638,000.00 and $1,287,900.00 respectively.  The total tax was $1,925,900.00.  Almost two million dollars out of your combined estates would have been taken for taxes.  That’s two million out of seven million, or twenty-nine (29%) of your wealth, for taxes.

 

The problem here is that you were unable to utilize the unified credit in the estate of the first spouse to die.  The marital deduction was nice, it offset all the tax, but then it was unavailable in the surviving spouse’s estate because there is no surviving spouse of the second spouse to die.  Since the maximum unified credit is $3.5 million, but the whole estate of $7.0 million is in the second to die spouse’s estate subject to tax, then there was a tax assessed on the remaining $3.5 million in the second estate.  You would have been better off not using the marital deduction in the first estate, but instead, passing $3.5 million of those “deductible” assets to the surviving spouse in a manner which allowed your estate to claim the full unified credit and which would keep ownership of those assets in the first estate, all the while giving the surviving spouse the benefits of the income from and principal of those same assets as a trust beneficiary. 

 

One might argue that tax can be avoided by simply making sure that the assets in each spouse’s taxable estate do not exceed $3.5 million. Why do you need a trust, when you can just divide up the ownership of the assets to keep each spouse’s interest under $3.5 million?  This is not the final solution, however, because assets left to the surviving spouse via the deceased spouse’s will are added to the survivor’s estate then, and if still owned by the survivor at the time of her death, result in her taxable estate being 7.0 million dollars!  Thus, you still have $2 million dollars of Estate tax payable from estate of the second spouse to die.

 

To accomplish this goal of avoiding estate tax completely on the $7.0 million in assets we  recommend  a disclaimer provision in the will of each spouse which allows the survivor to make a post-mortem decision to forego taking title to certain assets from the estate of the deceased spouse.  Under current law, disclaimed assets pass to other residuary beneficiaries named in the will, or to intestate distributees, however, the testator can anticipate the post-mortem disclaimer and provide in the will a contingency that requires that disclaimed assets instead be focused into a trust for the benefit of the surviving spouse. This trust in the estate of the first spouse to die would allow the surviving spouse all of the income from the trust and discretionary distributions from the trustee for her health, maintenance and educational expenses.  In essence, the surviving spouse has all of the benefits of outright ownership, except the ability to control the final disposition of the assets.  The children are the named beneficiaries to receive upon the death of the surviving spouse.  In this way a trust of about $3.5 million dollars can be set up in the first spouse’s estate which does not qualify for the marital deduction but does qualify for the unified credit, benefits the surviving spouse, and, because the sums in the trust are below the minimum threshold for federal estate tax, incurs no estate tax in the estate of the first spouse to die. This fund of assets will never enter the surviving spouses’ estate, instead bypassing her estate and going directly to the children upon her death.  This is also commonly known as a bypass trust for this reason.

 

The remaining $3.5 million dollars would be accepted from the first spouse’s estate or already be owned by the surviving spouse as her half of jointly owned property.  That money would be subject to tax in the second spouse’s estate; however, the second unified credit would shelter it from tax since it is below the threshold for tax.

 

Since New York taxes estates at $1,000,000.00 then some tax would be payable to New York on amounts between $1.0 million and 3.5 million in both estates.  The tax rate is much lower than the federal rate for estate tax. (NY-6.4% at $1.0 M, vs. Fed 55% at $3.5M to $7.0M).  The most tax that would have to be paid to the New York State Tax department on two $3.5 million dollar estates would be $229,200.00 on each estate or a total of $458,400.00.  One would find that the tax paid to New York on both estates is much less than cost of paying Federal and New York estate tax in estate of the second spouse to die, $458,400.00 versus $1,925,900.   Thus, the disclaimer trust will saves 1.46 million dollars versus a simple will.  This is money going to your children as opposed to Uncle Sam.

 

This is further shown by examining the unified credit itself.  The maximum unified credit under the federal system is $1,455,000.00, sheltering $3.5 million of assets.  Since the unified credit is a dollar for dollar tax reduction then in theory you should save $1.45 million dollars in tax by having two of such credits in two taxable estates totaling 7.0 million dollars of assets, as opposed to one taxable estate of the surviving spouse with $7.0 million of assets but only one credit sheltering half the assets. The numbers work out, as the tax differential is $1,466,000.00 in the two hypothetical estates mentioned above.

 

Presently, in 2010, the federal estate tax has been temporarily shelved.  The tax comes back in 2011 at year 2001 levels, ( Unified Credit of $345,000.00 sheltering $1,000,000.00 from federal tax ).  It is unlikely that Congress will either eliminate the tax or impose tax at such a low level as originally intended for 2011.  It is likely that whatever amount of minimum threshold is chosen for the tax, it will “catch” a lot of middle class taxpayers’ estates unless some advance planning is done to utilize the unified credit in each estate.

 

The unified credit disclaimer trust in husband-wife reciprocal wills can save millions and should be standard planning for couples with asset portfolios of this size.  Ask for our disclaimer trust will when you call us for your estate planning needs.